Lab — Docs
Review and documentation lab on `$ARCH_LAB` — architecture review plan, threat model review, documentation standards bundled for LAB-ARCH-001.
Visual · t41_review_lab
Lab: review/docs pack on YOUR $ARCH_LAB LAB-ARCH-001. Original Cyberlium.
Ship review and documentation artifacts from YOUR lab thread — review plan, TM review, doc standards — zero offensive findings or stranger org data.
On YOUR `$ARCH_LAB` per brief: (1) scope proof — Module 8 control selection pack labeled; (2) architecture review plan Module 9-1; (3) threat model review sheet Module 9-2; (4) documentation standards card Module 9-3 applied to prior artifacts; (5) review loop stub (design → TM review → doc standard → control trace); (6) integrity — `$ARCH_LAB` only, LAB-ARCH-001 scope, LAB disclaimer on all docs, no offensive exploit content, no stranger org reviews; (7) chmod 600 pack. Cross-link Modules 4–8 design thread — professional review handoff.
1. Lab deliverables
Review plan + TM review + doc standards cross-indexed — single governance thread.
Loop stub links finding IDs to control trace — accountability.
Command guide
Try these commands — Lab deliverables
═══ LINUX / macOS (Terminal Practice) ═══
Check system state and user context
Command — copy this
id whoami uname -a
Inspect network sockets listening for connections
Command — copy this
ss -tuln 2>/dev/null || netstat -tuln
Audit active processes
Command — copy this
ps aux | grep -v "\[" | head -15
═══ WINDOWS (POWERSHELL) ═══ Query user identity and system information
Command — copy this
whoami /all Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object CsName, OsName, OsVersion
Primary tools to practice this lesson: grep, curl. Reference sites: NIST 800-53 (https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final); OWASP ASVS (https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/); Microsoft SDL (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/securityengineering/sdl/). Run every command in the box — install first, then the usage lines — only on YOUR lab / program scope.
2. Quality bar
LAB disclaimer on every document — not optional.
Zero offensive exploit content in review findings — defensive mitigations only.
3. Teardown
Secure notes chmod 600; review pack ready for capstone evidence index.
Archive stub optional per brief.
4. What you ship: review lab pack
Review plan + TM review + doc standards + loop stub + integrity — chmod 600.
5. What you record before the next lesson
Review lab pack path.
6. Wrong vs right: offensive playbooks vs YOUR threat models
Worked failure — same MSF word, opposite target. Right never needs a café Wi-Fi or classmate laptop.
- Wrong: Review lab includes offensive exploit finding appendix as bonus deliverable.
- Right: Review lab pack on `$ARCH_LAB` LAB-ARCH-001. Next: quiz.
Mission: review lab
1) Scope and Module 8 control pack proof. 2) Architecture review and TM review. 3) Documentation standards applied to artifacts. 4) Integrity block; chmod 600.
Stuck? Ask Cyberlium AI Mentor
Ask Mentor: “Review loop — minimum nodes?”
APPLY: Review lab scope:
APPLY: True or False: Offensive exploit steps earn review lab credit.
APPLY: Review lab pack should: