Cyberlium

Vulnerability › Module 8 › Lesson 2

BeginnerModule 8Lesson 2/5

Finding Structure

Title, description, impact, evidence, remediation — one finding block from YOUR lab triage.

15 min+40 XP3 quiz
Module progress2 of 5

Visual · t18_finding_structure

Structured finding = reproducible defender handoff. Original Cyberlium.

Opening

A finding without evidence is gossip — a finding with exploit video on stranger host is a policy violation.

Standard VA finding block: Title, Severity (CVSS + priority tier), Affected Asset (from YOUR inventory), Description (what flaw is), Impact (what could happen in lab context), Evidence (safe verification output redacted), Remediation (patch/version/config), References (CVE/NVD link). Write two complete finding blocks from P1/P2 rows in triage lab. No exploit PoC screenshots, no live credentials, no copy-paste from stranger pentest reports you found online.

1. Required fields

Title: specific — 'OpenSSL 1.0.2 on lab-web-01' not 'Linux vulns.'

Impact: tie to asset role on $LAB_ASSETS — honest lab context.

Command guide

Try these commands — Required fields

═══ TOOLS & WEBSITES ═══ Browse / read these (authorized learning only — stay in YOUR lab / program scope)

CVSS in reports — https://www.first.org/cvss/ NVD — https://nvd.nist.gov

═══ INSTALL ═══

Linux (Debian/Ubuntu):

Command — copy this

sudo apt install jq

macOS:

Command — copy this

brew install jq

Windows:

Command — copy this

choco install jq

═══ LINUX / macOS ═══

Command — copy this

curl -sS 'https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?cveId=CVE-2021-44228' | jq '.vulnerabilities[0].cve.metrics.cvssMetricV31[0].cvssData.baseSeverity'
grep severity "$HOME/cyberlium-lab/t18-finding.txt" 2>/dev/null || echo 'Draft finding after enum'

Primary tools to practice this lesson: jq, grep. Reference sites: CVSS in reports (https://www.first.org/cvss/); NVD (https://nvd.nist.gov). Run every command in the box — install first, then the usage lines — only on YOUR lab / program scope.

2. Evidence line

One safe proof: package query output, header line, config snippet — redacted.

Link triage workbook row — traceability for retest later.

3. Remediation

Vendor fix version, workaround, or compensating control with owner placeholder.

No 'run this exploit to prove' — patch or config change only.

4. What you ship: two finding blocks

Two structured findings from lab triage + field checklist.

5. What you record before the next lesson

Finding blocks path.

6. Wrong vs right: stranger nets vs YOUR lab assets

Worked failure — same MSF word, opposite target. Right never needs a café Wi-Fi or classmate laptop.

  • Wrong

    Include Metasploit session screenshot from unauthorized target as evidence.

  • Right

    Write structured findings. Next: evidence hygiene.

Mission: draft two findings

1) Pick two triage rows. 2) Complete all finding fields. 3) Redact evidence; no exploit PoCs.

Stuck? Ask Cyberlium AI Mentor

Ask Mentor: “Impact vs Description overlap?”

Knowledge Check

1

APPLY: Finding evidence should be:

Multiple choice

Knowledge Check

2

APPLY: True or False: Exploit PoC screenshots required in VA report.

True or False

Knowledge Check

3

APPLY: Remediation recommends:

Multiple choice

← Previous

Answer all 3 knowledge checks to continue. (0/3 answered)