Responsible Disclosure
Responsible disclosure literacy — RoE, YOUR apps only, fix-before-talk, no stranger targets — on `$AI_LAB` reporting.
Visual · t32_responsible_disclosure
Responsible disclosure = named ethics rows. $AI_LAB YOUR apps. Original Cyberlium.
AI findings touch real users and keys — name responsible disclosure boundaries on YOUR lab work before testing or disclosing on stranger apps.
Responsible disclosure literacy names: Rules of Engagement reference, YOUR apps / `$AI_LAB` only scope, no stranger app testing, coordinated disclosure category for real findings outside lab, redaction in reports, and refuse jailbreak kit publication. Analyst adds responsible disclosure section to `$AI_LAB` report stub — cites Module 8 RoE rows — documents lab vs prod ticket path — without testing stranger LLM APIs, without publishing bypass kits, without 'responsible disclosure' theater on unauthorized targets. Cyberlium ethics gate for all Topic 32 findings artifacts. Refused: stranger app test, public bypass drop, prod paste without RoE. Lab row: responsible disclosure checklist ten items applied to findings pack.
1. Named ethics rows
RoE, YOUR apps, no stranger targets, disclosure boundary, redaction — five literacy anchors.
Lab writeups label practice scope — separate from prod ticket template.
Command guide
Try these commands — Named ethics rows
═══ LINUX / macOS (Terminal Practice) ═══
Check system state and user context
Command — copy this
id whoami uname -a
Inspect network sockets listening for connections
Command — copy this
ss -tuln 2>/dev/null || netstat -tuln
Audit active processes
Command — copy this
ps aux | grep -v "\[" | head -15
═══ WINDOWS (POWERSHELL) ═══ Query user identity and system information
Command — copy this
whoami /all Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object CsName, OsName, OsVersion
Primary tools to practice this lesson: grep, python3. Reference sites: OpenAI security (https://openai.com/security); CISA coordinated disclosure (https://www.cisa.gov/coordinated-vulnerability-disclosure-process); OWASP LLM Top 10 (https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/). Run every command in the box — install first, then the usage lines — only on YOUR lab / program scope.
2. Disclosure boundary
Real prod finding → ticket and owner path category — not public bypass repo.
Stranger app finding → do not test — refuse row mandatory in checklist.
3. Refused
No stranger app test; no jailbreak kit publication; no unauthorized prod disclosure.
Responsible disclosure supports professional practice — not weaponization.
4. What you ship: responsible disclosure checklist
Ten ethics items applied to findings pack + NEVER stranger app line.
5. What you record before the next lesson
Responsible disclosure checklist path.
6. Wrong vs right: stranger SaaS vs YOUR toy LLM
Worked failure — same MSF word, opposite target. Right never needs a café Wi-Fi or classmate laptop.
- Wrong: Publish jailbreak bypass kit on GitHub as 'responsible AI disclosure.'
- Right: Responsible disclosure checklist on `$AI_LAB` report stub. Next: Findings Lab.
Mission: responsible disclosure checklist
1) List ten responsible disclosure items. 2) Apply to findings pack. 3) RoE reference UTC. 4) Write NEVER stranger app testing line.
Stuck? Ask Cyberlium AI Mentor
Ask Mentor: “Lab vs prod ticket — literacy split?”
APPLY: Responsible disclosure on Cyberlium means:
APPLY: True or False: Stranger app testing is responsible disclosure lab.
APPLY: Real prod finding path: